DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Hits 1 – 11 of 11

1
Investigating the Folk Concept of Pain: Implication & Projection ...
Willemsen, Pascale. - : Open Science Framework, 2022
BASE
Show details
2
Deniability: Investigating the Folk Concept of Pain ...
Willemsen, Pascale. - : Open Science Framework, 2022
BASE
Show details
3
The polarity effect of evaluative language
BASE
Show details
4
Oddness/Naturalness of concept + but + thin concept ...
Willemsen, Pascale. - : Open Science Framework, 2021
BASE
Show details
5
Thick Ethical Concepts and Social Norms - Effect of Valence ...
Willemsen, Pascale. - : Open Science Framework, 2021
BASE
Show details
6
Are Thick Concepts Action-Guiding? Exp 2 ...
Willemsen, Pascale. - : Open Science Framework, 2021
BASE
Show details
7
Are Thick Concepts Action-Guiding? Exp 1 ...
Willemsen, Pascale. - : Open Science Framework, 2021
BASE
Show details
8
Examining evaluativity in legal discourse : A comparative corpus-linguistic study of thick concepts ...
Willemsen, Pascale; Baumgartner, Lucien; Frohofer, Severin. - : University of Zurich, 2021
BASE
Show details
9
Empirically investigating the concept of lying ...
BASE
Show details
10
Causal Attributions and Corpus Analysis
BASE
Show details
11
I must although I can't!? Suggestions for a two-level theory of ‘ought implies can’ ...
Willemsen, Pascale; Wiegmann, Alex. - : PsyArXiv, 2017
Abstract: The ‘Ought implies can’ principle (OIC) states that if you lack the ability to do X, then you are not morally obligated to do X. While philosophers believed it to be both normatively adequate and intuitively compelling, recent empirical findings suggest that laypeople reject OIC. In this paper, we suggest a pragmatically grounded model of the relationship between ought- and can-judgments to account for such findings. More specifically we argue that ‘ought’ is pragmatically used in two ways: namely as either expressing an obligation or recommending an action. We further argue that also ‘can’ is understood in two different ways: it can either describe a person’s general physical and mental faculties, or refer to a situation-specific ability. In two experiments, we show that moral obligations imply general abilities, and that moral imperatives imply situation-specific abilities. Once these two levels are carefully discriminated in empirical research, participants give responses that support OIC. ...
Keyword: FOS Languages and literature; FOS Psychology; Linguistics; Psychology; Semantics and Pragmatics; Social and Behavioral Sciences; Theory and Philosophy
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/hyq9u
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/hyq9u
BASE
Hide details

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
11
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern